From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45361 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OF7d6-00030O-W9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:25:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OF7cx-0004aK-Ok
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:25:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20699)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OF7cx-0004aC-H8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:25:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:25:32 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20100520122532.0e20ee7c@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BF55231.8020208@redhat.com>
References: <1274303733-3700-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<1274303733-3700-3-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<4BF45BCF.5090300@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100520104433.1be3167c@redhat.com> <4BF55231.8020208@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/6] json-lexer: Handle missing escapes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 20 May 2010 17:16:01 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/20/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >   I think there's another issue in the handling of strings.
> >
> >   The spec says that valid unescaped chars are in the following range:
> >
> >      unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF
> >
> >   But we do:
> >
> >      [IN_DQ_STRING] = {
> >          [1 ... 0xFF] = IN_DQ_STRING,
> >          ['\\'] = IN_DQ_STRING_ESCAPE,
> >          ['"'] = IN_DONE_STRING,
> >      },
> >
> >   Shouldn't we cover 0x20 .. 0xFF instead?
> 
> If it's the lexer, isn't just it being liberal in what it accepts?

 Yes, it's the lexer, but you meant that the fix should be in
somewhere else?