From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42410 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGnNb-0006Fk-9K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:12:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1OGnNa-0007R1-4f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:12:43 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44703)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1OGnNZ-0007Qr-SH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:12:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:12:38 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling
	to pc.c
Message-ID: <20100525061238.GO22163@redhat.com>
References: <AANLkTiklEOofhSQ0zt9ep2yV3zMeOdxseX9QkWyV3uXV@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BF94C6E.8080800@web.de>
	<AANLkTilbxi1I10MRw6EtB23OH30udpCnmfTw3GyonjzE@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BFA9BAE.1040502@web.de>
	<AANLkTinSzHVOeDg6LZfAlyMssFRkRxW8LH4yCUEejmm8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BFADF8F.9050103@web.de> <20100525053149.GL22163@redhat.com>
	<4BFB697E.60204@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BFB697E.60204@web.de>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:09:02AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:20:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> Maybe the coalescing should be pushed to APIC, or even generalized.
> >> The latter has happened, hopefully in the right direction.
> >>
> > What do you mean by that?
> 
> The latter: I tried to generalize. Please look at patch 7 & 8 of my HPET
> series.
> 
Already did. I hope you will have more luck with this (obviously
correct) approach than I had two years ago.

--
			Gleb.