From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33318 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHct9-0004rt-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:12:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHct5-0003nx-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:12:43 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.163]:36802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHct4-0003nM-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:12:39 -0400 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4RDCYLb028568 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:12:34 GMT Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4RDCYGh667684 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:12:34 +0100 Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o4RDCYR7029009 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:12:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:12:33 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] posix-aio-compat: Expand tabs that have crept in Message-ID: <20100527131233.GA3584@stefan-thinkpad.transitives.com> References: <1274961128-3358-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4BFE6AAE.7060707@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BFE6AAE.7060707@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:50:54PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > I'm usually not a big supporter of patches that only change style, but > tabs are nasty and you can ignore these whitespace changes in git blame > at least, so for all I care let's take it for once. Interesting, I tend to prefer separate code change and whitespace change patches. It's hard to review a patch that combines code and whitespace changes because you have to manually compare the touched lines to see what, if anything, has changed. Is this the policy across all of QEMU or your preference for block-related code? I'll try to follow it for that area in the future. Thanks, Stefan