From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
agraf@suse.de, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] 64-bit io paths
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 22:03:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005282203.58406.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
[Hit send too early on previous mail...]
> The basic device interface looks like
> ...
> +
> +/* Register a memory region at START_ADDR/SIZE. The REGION structure will
> + be initialized appropriately for DEV using CB as the operation set. */
> +extern void cpu_register_memory_region(MemoryRegion *region,
> + const MemoryCallbackInfo *cb,
> + target_phys_addr_t start_addr,
> + target_phys_addr_t size);
> +
> +/* Unregister a memory region. */
> +extern void cpu_unregister_memory_region(MemoryRegion *);
> +
> +/* Allocate ram for use with cpu_register_memory_region. */
> +extern const MemoryCallbackInfo *qemu_ram_alloc_r(ram_addr_t);
> +extern void qemu_ram_free_r(const MemoryCallbackInfo *);
>
> The Basic Idea is that we have a MemoryRegion object that describes
> a contiguous mapping within the guest address space. This object
> needs to handle RAM, ROM and devices. The desire to handle memory
> and devices the same comes from the wish to have PCI device BARs
> show up as plain memory in the TLB as plain memory, and to be able
> to handle all PCI device regions identically within sysbus.
Looks reasonable to me.
I'm tempted to add a DeviceState* argument to cpu_register_memory_region.
This might be informative for debugging, and allow future disjoint bus
support. OTOH it might be more trouble than it's worth.
> I will admit that I do not yet have a good replacement for IO_MEM_ROMD,
> or toggling the read-only bit on a RAM region.
I suggest adding a MemoryCallbackInfo* argument to qemu_ram_alloc_r.
If NULL this allocates a regular RAM block. if non-null it allocates a hybrid
ROM/IO block using the specified callbacks for IO accesses. Then introduce a
function that allows a device to switch a mapping between ROM and IO modes.
Likewise to make a mapping of a RAM region readonly.
Paul
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 21:03 Paul Brook [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-20 20:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] 64-bit io paths Richard Henderson
2010-04-22 19:38 ` Blue Swirl
2010-04-22 19:55 ` Richard Henderson
2010-04-22 20:01 ` Blue Swirl
2010-04-22 21:19 ` Richard Henderson
2010-04-23 18:30 ` Blue Swirl
2010-05-28 20:45 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005282203.58406.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).