From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: RFC: blockdev_add & friends, brief rationale, QMP docs
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:48:59 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100531104859.1e63fa85@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3pr0c49ha.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:05:37 +0200
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>
> >>> If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
> >>> set the password and try again.
> >>>
> >> It's what we do today, a password should be set with block_passwd before
> >> issuing the change command. Otherwise an error is throw.
> >>
> >
> > Is the password some kind of global or per-monitor property? In that
> > case it doesn't work with parallel execution of commands; better to
> > have a password field (or assign IDs to passwords and require a
> > passwordid=... argument).
>
> It sets the password in the host BlockDriverState. Which must already
> exist, i.e. you do it after blockdev_add.
>
> What happens if the guest device accesses the host drive before the key
> is set?
It's supposed to fail, right Kevin?
>
> Anything wrong with passing the password as argument? Did we avoid that
> to protect naive users from exposing their password via argv[]? That
> "argument" doesn't apply to QMP.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-31 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 18:21 [Qemu-devel] RFC: blockdev_add & friends, brief rationale, QMP docs Markus Armbruster
2010-05-28 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2010-05-28 19:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-28 19:24 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-05-30 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-31 11:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-05-31 13:48 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2010-05-31 14:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-30 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-31 10:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-05-31 11:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-31 11:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-04 14:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-04 14:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-04 15:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-04 16:20 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-06 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-08 9:41 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100531104859.1e63fa85@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).