From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:20:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100531122055.GB1704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005311716.43573.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> > I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> > I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
> > Posting for early flames/comments.
>
> Sorry, not without some evidence that it'll actually reduce cacheline
> bouncing. I *think* it will, but it's not obvious: the host may keep
> looking at avail_idx as we're updating last_seen. Or does qemu always
> look at both together anyway?
> Can someone convince me this is a win?
> Rusty.
What really happens is host looks at flags and last_seen together.
And flags happens to be in the same cache line with avail idx.
So to get an obvious win, we should put flags and last_seen
in a separate cache line from avail, which us easy - just add some padding.
And I'll relax the requirement from guest to only require it to update
last_seen when interrupts are enabled. This way flags and
last_seen are written together and read together.
Makes sense?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-31 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 19:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 1/2] virtio: support layout with avail ring before idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 2/2] virtio: publish used idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-27 12:07 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Avi Kivity
2010-05-27 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-28 9:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-30 11:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-31 7:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-31 13:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-31 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-06-02 20:39 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100531122055.GB1704@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).