qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:29:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100531132950.GC1704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0366E0.6040203@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:36:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/30/10 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
> >> while reading through it:
> >>
> >> Rather than storing a pointer within the ring struct, pointing into a
> >> position within the same struct. How about storing a byte offset instead
> >> and using a cast to get to the pointer position? That would avoid the
> >> pointer dereference, which is less effective cache wise and harder for
> >> the CPU to predict.
> >>
> >> Not sure whether it really matters performance wise, just a thought.
> > 
> > I think this won't work: when PUBLUSH_USED_IDX is negotiated,
> > the pointer is to within the ring.
> 
> Hmmm shame, it would be a nice optimization.
> 
> Maybe it's time to introduce the v2 ring format, rather than having
> adding more kludges to the existing one?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jes

There has been discussion about a ring format that does not
use indexes at all. My guess is that would be a good point
for v2 ring format. But making that a product
and tuning might take a while. So definitely something to
keep in mind but I would not want that to block this optimization.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-31 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-26 19:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 1/2] virtio: support layout with avail ring before idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 2/2] virtio: publish used idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-27 12:07 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Avi Kivity
2010-05-27 13:59   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-28  9:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-30 11:22   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-31  7:36     ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-31 13:29       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-05-31  7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:20   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-02 20:39   ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100531132950.GC1704@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).