From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39186 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJ5DU-0006yH-I0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:39:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ5DT-00028B-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:39:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ5DT-00027z-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:39:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:35:27 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20100531133527.GA2285@redhat.com> References: <20100530155000.GA30051@redhat.com> <20100530180545.GA30132@redhat.com> <4C03B0CE.3040102@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C03B0CE.3040102@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PULL] pci, vhost fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The >> discussion about that was earlier. > > How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code? > > Paolo Good point. That code is linux-only, so we are safe using %lld. By the time someone ports vhost to windows, there's a chance debian will update it's mingw. Blue Swirl? -- MST