From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] stop cpus before forking.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:42:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614194237.GD19104@mothafucka.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1683EC.3010609@codemonkey.ws>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:33:00PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 02:27 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >This patch fixes a bug that happens with kvm, irqchip-in-kernel,
> >while adding a netdev. Despite the situations of reproduction being
> >specific to kvm, I believe this fix is pretty generic, and fits here.
> >Specially if we ever want to have our own irqchip in kernel too.
> >
> >The problem happens after the fork system call, and although it is not
> >100 % reproduceable, happens pretty often. After fork, the memory where
> >the apic is mapped is present in both processes. It ends up confusing
> >the vcpus somewhere in the irq<-> ack path, and qemu hangs, with no
> >irqs being delivered at all from that point on.
> >
> >Making sure the vcpus are stopped before forking makes the problem go
> >away. Besides, this is a pretty unfrequent operation, which already hangs
> >the io-thread for a while. So it should not hurt performance.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@redhat.com>
>
> This doesn't make very much sense to me but smells like a kernel bug to me.
My interpretation is that by doing that, we make sure no in-flight
requests are happening. Actually, a sleep(x), with x sufficiently big
is enough to make this problem go away, but that is too hacky.
I do agree that this is most likely a kernel bug. But as with any other
kernel bugs, I believe this is a easy workaround to have things working
even in older kernels until we fix it.
>
> Even if it isn't, I can't rationalize why stopping the vm like this
> is enough to fix such a problem. Is the problem that the KVM VCPU
> threads get duplicated while potentially running or something like
> that?
I doubt fork is duplicating the vcpu threads. More than that, this
bug does not happen with userspace irqchip.
So I believe that either irq request or the ack itself is reaching the
wrong process, forever stalling the apic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 19:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] stop cpus before forking Glauber Costa
2010-06-14 19:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-14 19:42 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2010-06-14 19:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-14 20:05 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 16:57 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-15 6:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-15 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 7:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 7:33 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 16:58 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-22 12:18 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100614194237.GD19104@mothafucka.localdomain \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).