qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] stop cpus before forking.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:42:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614194237.GD19104@mothafucka.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1683EC.3010609@codemonkey.ws>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:33:00PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 02:27 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >This patch fixes a bug that happens with kvm, irqchip-in-kernel,
> >while adding a netdev. Despite the situations of reproduction being
> >specific to kvm, I believe this fix is pretty generic, and fits here.
> >Specially if we ever want to have our own irqchip in kernel too.
> >
> >The problem happens after the fork system call, and although it is not
> >100 % reproduceable, happens pretty often. After fork, the memory where
> >the apic is mapped is present in both processes. It ends up confusing
> >the vcpus somewhere in the irq<->  ack path, and qemu hangs, with no
> >irqs being delivered at all from that point on.
> >
> >Making sure the vcpus are stopped before forking makes the problem go
> >away. Besides, this is a pretty unfrequent operation, which already hangs
> >the io-thread for a while. So it should not hurt performance.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@redhat.com>
> 
> This doesn't make very much sense to me but smells like a kernel bug to me.
My interpretation is that by doing that, we make sure no in-flight
requests are happening. Actually, a sleep(x), with x sufficiently big
is enough to make this problem go away, but that is too hacky.

I do agree that this is most likely a kernel bug. But as with any other
kernel bugs, I believe this is a easy workaround to have things working
even in older kernels until we fix it.

> 
> Even if it isn't, I can't rationalize why stopping the vm like this
> is enough to fix such a problem.  Is the problem that the KVM VCPU
> threads get duplicated while potentially running or something like
> that?

I doubt fork is duplicating the vcpu threads. More than that, this
bug does not happen with userspace irqchip.
So I believe that either irq request or the ack itself is reaching the
wrong process, forever stalling the apic.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14 19:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] stop cpus before forking Glauber Costa
2010-06-14 19:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-14 19:42   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2010-06-14 19:58     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-14 20:05       ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 16:57       ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-15  6:14     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-15  7:36       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15  7:35     ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15  7:33   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 16:58     ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-22 12:18       ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100614194237.GD19104@mothafucka.localdomain \
    --to=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).