qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] net: Fix hotplug with pci_add
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:35:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615080535.GB20578@amit-laptop.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100609095811.GB20595@amit-laptop.redhat.com>

On (Wed) Jun 09 2010 [15:28:11], Amit Shah wrote:
> > Let me rephrase: Behavior changes for -net types without an init()
> > method.  The only one without an init() method is "none".  Before,
> > net_client_init() succeeded for it.  Now it fails.  What's the impact of
> > that change?  And why does it make sense?
> 
> It makes sense because we don't actually initialise anything. We don't
> place anything in the nd_table[] array. That means callers shouldn't
> poke in the array for any values. Returning -1 makes sense for that
> reason. If we continued to return 0, callers might just assume that init
> was successful and that nd_table[0] was set up for use appropriately.
> 
> The thing is that the code doesn't go this far in case of '-net none'
> anyway. This was just a potential bug lurking around for any new -net
> method which didn't have an init.

Hm, I only tested -net none from the monitor, using pci_add. Looks like
I skipped testing it from the cmd line. I did that today and found out
the VM doesn't start. I've sent a patch to revert to the original
behaviour of returning 0, and we'll have to find another way of fixing
the 'success or index' return problem.

		Amit

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-08 15:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] net: Fix hotplug with pci_add Amit Shah
2010-06-08 15:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-06-08 16:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2010-06-08 17:26   ` Amit Shah
2010-06-09  6:37     ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-09  7:59       ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-06-09 10:28         ` Amit Shah
2010-06-09  9:58       ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2010-06-09 11:31         ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15  8:05         ` Amit Shah [this message]
2010-06-09  9:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100615080535.GB20578@amit-laptop.redhat.com \
    --to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).