From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Qemu-development List <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] qemu: Generic task offloading framework: threadlets
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:07:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616150714.GA24172@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100616145858.GA19642@shareable.org>
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/16/2010 09:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >On 06/16/2010 04:22 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > >>Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>>These should be (at least for now) block-obj-$(CONFIG_POSIX).
> > >>>
> > >>>>+ while (QTAILQ_EMPTY(&(queue->request_list))&&
> > >>>>+ (ret != ETIMEDOUT)) {
> > >>>>+ ret = qemu_cond_timedwait(&(queue->cond),
> > >>>>+ &(queue->lock), 10*100000);
> > >>>>+ }
> > >>>
> > >>>Using qemu_cond_timedwait is a hack for not properly broadcasting the
> > >>>condvar in flush_threadlet_queue.
> > >>
> > >>Are you sure? It looks like it also expires idle threads after a
> > >>fixed amount of idle time.
> > >
> > >Unnecessary idle threads are immediately expired as soon as the
> > >threadlet exits if ncecessary, since here
> >
> > If a threadlet is waiting to consume more work, unless we do a
> > pthread_cancel (I dislike cancellation) it will keep waiting until it
> > gets more work (which would mean it's not actually idle)...
>
> There's some mild abuse of the mutex/condvar going on.
>
> As (queue->exit || queue->idle_threads > queue->min_threads) is a
> condition for breaking out of the loop, that condition ought to be
> checked in the mutex->cond_wait region, but it isn't.
>
> It doesn't matter here because the queue is empty when queue->exit,
> and the idle > min_threads condition can't become true.
Sorry, thinko. It does matter when queue->exit, precisely because the
queue is empty :-)
Even cond_broadcast after queue->exit is set isn't enough to remove
the need for the timed wait hack.
Putting the whole condition inside the mutex->cond_wait region, not
just empty queue test, will remove the need for timed wait. Broadcast
is still needed, or alternatively a cond_signal from each exiting
thread will allow them to wake and close without a thundering herd.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-16 11:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] qemu: Threadlets: A generic task offloading framework Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-16 11:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] qemu: Add qemu-barrier support to qemu-thread framework Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-16 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 14:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-16 11:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/3] qemu: Generic task offloading framework: threadlets Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-16 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-16 14:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-06-16 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-16 14:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 14:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-16 15:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 15:47 ` Corentin Chary
2010-06-16 15:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 16:06 ` Corentin Chary
2010-06-17 9:16 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-17 9:12 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-16 14:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-06-16 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-06-16 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-17 8:53 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-17 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-17 18:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-18 7:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-16 11:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 3/3] qemu: Convert AIO code to use threadlets Gautham R Shenoy
2010-06-16 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] qemu: Threadlets: A generic task offloading framework Anthony Liguori
2010-06-16 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616150714.GA24172@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).