qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: RFC qdev path semantics
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:01:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006172301.22115.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276811010.3216.25.camel@x201>

> > ### Paul proposes to require all buses to define bus addresses.  Make
> >     one up if necessary.
> 
> That seems arbitrary and prone to breakage.  How do we handle a subtle
> change in device instantiation order and still allow migration?  If by
> code change or command line ordering my frobnitz moves from:
> 
> /i440FX-pcihost/pci.0/PIIX3/@01.0/isa.0/0
> 
> to
> 
> /i440FX-pcihost/pci.0/PIIX3/@01.0/isa.0/1

Two things are apparent here. 
(a) You've clearly misunderstood the proposals. The paths above make no sense.

(b) You've picked a particularly poor definition of device address for the ISA 
bus. We can do much better than device creation order.

> ...
> I can live with PATH/@BUS-ADDR if it's still felt that
> PATH/IDENT@BUS-ADDR isn't canonical.  What that means is that I'll
> probably code up vmstate and ramblocks to append IDENT themselves to
> keep all the goodness of having per PATH/IDENT namespaces.

As discussed elsewhere in this thread, addition of IDENT to the device path is 
neither necessary nor sufficient for migration.

I really feel like we're going round in circles here.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14  5:51 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/5] qdev: Create qdev_get_dev_path() Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  6:39   ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-14 12:52     ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 13:00       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 13:09       ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 15:29         ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 15:42           ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 16:00           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 16:38             ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 16:49               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 18:35                 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 21:43                   ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 22:11                     ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 22:46                       ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15  1:14                         ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 11:24                           ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15  8:47         ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15  9:34           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 11:28             ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 11:45               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 12:04                 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 12:16                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 12:39                     ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:00                       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 13:14                         ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:16                 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 13:32                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 20:53               ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 21:55                 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 22:33                   ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 23:01                     ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 23:10                       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16  0:25                       ` Chris Wright
2010-06-16  0:30                         ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16  0:35                           ` Chris Wright
2010-06-16  1:30                             ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16  2:55                               ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16  8:23                 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-17 22:25                   ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18  9:16                     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 15:01                       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18 15:22                         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 14:03                     ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-18 14:14                       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 15:21                       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 11:42             ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 11:59               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 13:07                 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 13:19                   ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:32                     ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 15:08                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 13:02                     ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-14  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/5] savevm: Add DeviceState param Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/5] savevm: Make use of the new " Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/5] eepro100: Add a dev field to eeprom new/free functions Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-net: Incorporate a DeviceState pointer and let savevm track instances Alex Williamson
2010-06-14  7:02 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-14 19:56   ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15  8:53     ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 18:01       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16  8:34         ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16  8:36           ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15  9:12     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-15 18:03       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16  9:46 ` RFC qdev path semantics (was: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string) Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16 10:40   ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 11:37   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: RFC qdev path semantics Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 11:45     ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 12:01       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 12:21         ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 13:50           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 13:05   ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16 13:23     ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 14:31       ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-17 21:43   ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-17 22:01     ` Paul Brook [this message]
2010-06-17 22:34       ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18  7:52     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-18 14:58   ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-22 14:27   ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201006172301.22115.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).