From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52501 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORhkR-00045T-63
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:25:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1ORhk0-0001Pn-Lb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:24:59 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50085)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1ORhk0-0001Pc-Bx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:24:56 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:19:39 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pci: set PCI multi-function
	bit appropriately.
Message-ID: <20100624081939.GB937@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1277100005.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<99d849f1b4eeb12893447e78a6950c26a32088ac.1277100005.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<20100621123600.GB10511@redhat.com>
	<20100623072520.GC3471@valinux.co.jp>
	<20100623095210.GA9802@redhat.com>
	<20100623101338.GD3471@valinux.co.jp>
	<20100623104157.GA19664@redhat.com>
	<20100623234842.GG3471@valinux.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100623234842.GG3471@valinux.co.jp>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, yu.liu@freescale.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net, paul@codesourcery.com

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:48:42AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:41:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I will try to find a bit of time to rearrange the code in pci.c a bit,
> > but this can come afterwards.
> 
> I'd like to move pci_bridge_xxx into pci_bridge.c because
> pci.c has grown.
> Are you okay with it? Or should I wait for your rearrange?
> I'd like to avoid stepping on each other.

I'm looking at rearranging it myself, but doing some API cleanup first.
It will be easier if you keep adding to pci.c meanwhile.

> -- 
> yamahata