qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] lsi53c895a: fix Phase Mismatch Jump
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:11:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629211150.GA3811@ohm.aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276535514-19724-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:11:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2.  This does
> not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
> both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests.  This is the text
> from the spec:
> 
>    "[The PMJCTL] bit controls which decision mechanism is used
>    when jumping on phase mismatch. When this bit is cleared the
>    LSI53C895A will use Phase Mismatch Jump Address 1 (PMJAD1) when
>    the WSR bit is cleared and Phase Mismatch Jump Address 2 (PMJAD2)
>    when the WSR bit is set.  When this bit is set the LSI53C895A will
>    use jump address one (PMJAD1) on data out (data out, command,
>    message out) transfers and jump address two (PMJAD2) on data in
>    (data in, status, message in) transfers."
> 
> Which means:
> 
>     CCNTL0.PMJCTL
>         0              SCNTL2.WSR = 0             PMJAD1
>         0              SCNTL2.WSR = 1             PMJAD2
>         1                    out                  PMJAD1
>         1                    in                   PMJAD2
> 
> In qemu, what you get instead is:
> 
>     CCNTL0.PMJCTL
>         0                    out                  PMJAD1
>         0                    in                   PMJAD2    <<<<<
>         1                    out                  PMJAD1
>         1                    in                   PMJAD1    <<<<<
> 
> Considering that qemu always has SCNTL2.WSR cleared, the two marked cases
> (corresponding to phase mismatch on input) are always jumping to the
> wrong PMJAD register.  The patch implements the correct semantics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>         > Looks correct. But why not assigning s->pmjad[12] directly? Would
>         > improve readability IMO.
> 
>         No particular reason, hence fine by me.

Thanks, applied.

>  hw/lsi53c895a.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/lsi53c895a.c b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> index f5a91ba..9a37fed 100644
> --- a/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> +++ b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ static void lsi_bad_phase(LSIState *s, int out, int new_phase)
>  {
>      /* Trigger a phase mismatch.  */
>      if (s->ccntl0 & LSI_CCNTL0_ENPMJ) {
> -        if ((s->ccntl0 & LSI_CCNTL0_PMJCTL) || out) {
> -            s->dsp = s->pmjad1;
> +        if ((s->ccntl0 & LSI_CCNTL0_PMJCTL)) {
> +            s->dsp = out ? s->pmjad1 : s->pmjad2;
>          } else {
> -            s->dsp = s->pmjad2;
> +            s->dsp = (s->scntl2 & LSI_SCNTL2_WSR ? s->pmjad2 : s->pmjad1);
>          }
>          DPRINTF("Data phase mismatch jump to %08x\n", s->dsp);
>      } else {
> -- 
> 1.7.0.1
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14 16:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] lsi53c895a: fix Phase Mismatch Jump Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-14 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 17:10   ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-14 17:11   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-25  8:02     ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-29 21:11     ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2010-06-14 17:14   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] " Michal Novotny
2010-06-14 17:31     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 17:34       ` Michal Novotny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100629211150.GA3811@ohm.aurel32.net \
    --to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).