From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52431 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OURVF-0007Wx-5e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:41:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OURV9-0001P6-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:41:00 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:47782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OURV9-0001Ow-Mv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:40:55 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bug 599958] Re: Timedrift problems with Win7: hpet missing time drift fixups Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 22:40:51 +0100 References: <20100629211802.16137.10587.malonedeb@soybean.canonical.com> <201007011645.18184.paul@codesourcery.com> <4C2CE393.3040203@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4C2CE393.3040203@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007012240.51967.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Jan Kiszka , Gleb Natapov > I really see no tangible objection to Jan's patches. They don't impact > any other code. They don't inhibit flexibility in the infrastructure. > You might consider it to be a "hack" but so what. QEMU is filled with > hacks. It would be useless without them because there would be very > little code. I object strongly to anything that makes qemu_irq a message passing API. if you want message passing then you should not be using qemu_irq. Paul