qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com,
	paul@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Status update
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 20:17:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702171743.GB6809@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100702094155.GC16712@valinux.co.jp>

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:41:55PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
> > <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro> wrote:
> > > But suddenly the guest OS changes mappings and expects the IOMMU to
> > > enforce them as soon as invalidation commands are completed. The guest
> > > then reclaims the old space for other uses. This leaves an opportunity
> > > for those processes to corrupt or read sensitive data.
> 
> In such a case, OS should put device into quiescence by reset like
> pci bus reset or pcie function level reset.
> pci bus reset patch hasn't been merged yet, though.
> It needs clean up/generalization.
> 
> -- 
> yamahata

I wouldn't count on that. When the IOMMU notifies software of command
completion, then that notification should be correct. So if we count on
'pci bus reset' we either don't execute INVALIDATE_* and COMPLETION_WAIT
commands, or we issue bogus notifications (e.g. they'd be nops). That
goes against the specs, and I'm not sure there's any good reason a
non-KVM/QEMU-aware OS would reset the device in _all_ cases.

For some background on this, mappings updates are followed by
INVALIDATE_* commands and then a COMPLETION_WAIT (to wait for
invalidation to finish).


	Eduard

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-02 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29 17:25 [Qemu-devel] Status update Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2010-06-30  8:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-07-01 19:30   ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2010-07-02  8:03     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-07-02  9:41       ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-02 17:17         ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu [this message]
2010-07-02 17:05       ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100702171743.GB6809@localhost \
    --to=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).