From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com,
paul@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Status update
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 20:17:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702171743.GB6809@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100702094155.GC16712@valinux.co.jp>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:41:55PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
> > <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro> wrote:
> > > But suddenly the guest OS changes mappings and expects the IOMMU to
> > > enforce them as soon as invalidation commands are completed. The guest
> > > then reclaims the old space for other uses. This leaves an opportunity
> > > for those processes to corrupt or read sensitive data.
>
> In such a case, OS should put device into quiescence by reset like
> pci bus reset or pcie function level reset.
> pci bus reset patch hasn't been merged yet, though.
> It needs clean up/generalization.
>
> --
> yamahata
I wouldn't count on that. When the IOMMU notifies software of command
completion, then that notification should be correct. So if we count on
'pci bus reset' we either don't execute INVALIDATE_* and COMPLETION_WAIT
commands, or we issue bogus notifications (e.g. they'd be nops). That
goes against the specs, and I'm not sure there's any good reason a
non-KVM/QEMU-aware OS would reset the device in _all_ cases.
For some background on this, mappings updates are followed by
INVALIDATE_* commands and then a COMPLETION_WAIT (to wait for
invalidation to finish).
Eduard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-29 17:25 [Qemu-devel] Status update Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2010-06-30 8:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-07-01 19:30 ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2010-07-02 8:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-07-02 9:41 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-02 17:17 ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu [this message]
2010-07-02 17:05 ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100702171743.GB6809@localhost \
--to=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).