From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40295 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYg9t-0002qU-Jk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:08:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OYg9r-0007io-Vm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:08:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20603)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1OYg9r-0007id-PY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:08:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:08:12 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th
Message-ID: <20100713110812.597d31d0@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com>
References: <m3eif8iw82.fsf@trasno.mitica> <4C3BED6C.20601@redhat.com>
	<4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Avi Kivity a =C3=A9crit :
> >   =20
> >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>     =20
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       =20
> >> 0.12.n+1
> >>
> >>     =20
> > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
> >
> > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
> > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
> > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
> > are needed in addition).
> >   =20
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable=20
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or=20
> data integrity fixes).

I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
remember who.