From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47063 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZTPH-0007f6-2V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:43:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>) id 1OZTPG-0006Hs-13
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:43:38 -0400
Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:41109)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>) id 1OZTPF-0006Hb-Uv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:43:37 -0400
Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so674416gwj.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:28 -0500
From: "Justin M. Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th
Message-ID: <20100715184328.GA16484@linuxtx.org>
References: <m3eif8iw82.fsf@trasno.mitica> <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws>
	<4C3C9BE2.5010200@redhat.com> <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Brian Jackson <iggy@theiggy.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> > >> data integrity fixes).
> > > 
> > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > > master releases?
> > 
> > Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> > to users.
> 
> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
> the upstream qemu stable tree.

I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
access.

Justin