From: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
To: Cam Macdonell <cam@cs.ualberta.ca>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unusual physical address when using 64-bit BAR
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:52:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100720095223.GC24957@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin9EFs_FwDqHXP8zFTUIAPhTOjTAsf53zZiS3bQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:10:28AM -0600, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:48:19PM -0600, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:05:51PM -0600, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> >> >> >> > Seabios completely ignore the 64-bitness of the BAR. ?Looks like it also
> >> >> >> > thinks the second half of the BAR is an I/O region instead of memory (hence
> >> >> >> > the c200, that's part of the pci portio region.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've sent the patches to address it. But they haven't been merged yet.
> >> >> > seabios doesn't map BARs beyond 4GB.
> >> >> > If bar is mapped beyond 4GB, guest BIOS does it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Have those patches been merged yet?
> >> >
> >> > They have been merged into seabios upstream now.
> >> > qemu seabios fork hasn't pulled for a while, though.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > To see how seabios works, it would help to increase CONFIG_DEBUG_LEVEL
> >> >> > in config.h of seabios
> >> >>
> >> >> Where does the output from seabios end up? ?Inside dmesg?
> >> >
> >> > It outputs them to the serial console which qemu emulates.
> >> > seabios is out of kernel control, so dmesg doesn't show it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >> pci_read_config: (val) 0x0 <- 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >> pci_read_config: (val) 0xffffffff <- 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >> pci_read_config: (val) 0x0 <- 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x1c (addr)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > seabios BAR3. Not sure how it is mapped from this
> >> >> > message.
> >> >>
> >> >> Isn't the BAR3 from the fact that a 64-bit BAR would use both BAR2 and
> >> >> BAR3 to store all 64-bits?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. Seabios misbehaves. 64bit bar is(was) a missing feature.
> >> > --
> >> > yamahata
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> With the latest seabios git passed via -bios, I no longer see the
> >> 48-bit address, but instead a 32-bit address and then
> >> ffffffff00000000. ?This guest has 1gb of RAM so the address isn't be
> >> mapped beyond 4g.
> >
> > Can I see the debug log like before?
> > (hopefully seabios with CONFIG_DEBUG_LEVEL enabled.)
>
> Here's the dump from SeaBIOS in the region related to the PCI devices.
> The SeaBIOS output is identical whether the BAR is 32-bit or 64-bit.
>
> PCI: bus=0 devfn=0x10: vendor_id=0x1013 device_id=0x00b8
> region 0: 0xf0000000
> region 1: 0xf2000000
> region 6: 0xf2010000
> PCI: bus=0 devfn=0x18: vendor_id=0x1af4 device_id=0x1000
> region 0: 0x0000c020
> region 1: 0xf2020000
> region 6: 0xf2030000
> PCI: bus=0 devfn=0x20: vendor_id=0x1af4 device_id=0x1110
> region 0: 0xf2040000
> region 1: 0xf2041000
> region 2: 0x00000000
Is this region (region 2 of devfn=0x20: vendor_id=0x1af4 device_id=0x1110)
the BAR in quistion?
The value 0 seems odd. Probably BAR address calculation overflowed.
Currently seabios doesn't check overflow. I attached the patch.
> > Do you know who sets the BAR to ffffffff00000000?
>
> Here are the config reads/writes related to the 0x18/1c, the 'IVSHMEM'
> lines are from the map function passed to pci_register_bar(). It
> looks like SeaBIOS sets the address to 0 and then the potentially
> useful e0000000 address gets mangled into ffffffff000000.
There is something wrong with the debug message of write case, I suppose.
All written value are 0, but the resulted effect doesn't seems so.
>
> IVSHMEM: guest pci addr = 0, guest h/w addr = 1090912256, size = 536870912
>
> ...snip...
>
> pci_read_config: (val) 0x4 <- 0x18 (addr)
> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x18 (addr)
> IVSHMEM: guest pci addr = e0000000, guest h/w addr = 1090912256, size = 20000000
If 0 is written to 0x18, the bar address should be 0, but it says e0000000.
> pci_read_config: (val) 0xe0000004 <- 0x18 (addr)
The read value isn't 0. and so on...
> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x18 (addr)
> pci_read_config: (val) 0x0 <- 0x1c (addr)
> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x1c (addr)
> IVSHMEM: guest pci addr = ffffffff00000000, guest h/w addr =
> 1090912256, size = 20000000
> pci_read_config: (val) 0xffffffff <- 0x1c (addr)
> pci_write_config: (val) 0x0 -> 0x1c (addr)
>
> and with the 64-bit guest I get this error as well (recall the guest
> fails to boot on 64-bit)
>
> BUG: kvm_dirty_pages_log_change: invalid parameters
> 00000000f0000000-00000000f0ffffff
diff --git a/src/pciinit.c b/src/pciinit.c
index b110531..6eca2ce 100644
--- a/src/pciinit.c
+++ b/src/pciinit.c
@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ static int pci_bios_allocate_region(u16 bdf, int region_num)
/* If pci_bios_prefmem_addr == 0, keep old behaviour */
pci_bios_prefmem_addr != 0) {
paddr = &pci_bios_prefmem_addr;
- if (ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size >= BUILD_PCIPREFMEM_END) {
+ if (ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size < *paddr ||
+ ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size >= BUILD_PCIPREFMEM_END) {
dprintf(1,
"prefmem region of (bdf 0x%x bar %d) can't be mapped. "
"decrease BUILD_PCIMEM_SIZE and recompile. size %x\n",
@@ -99,7 +100,8 @@ static int pci_bios_allocate_region(u16 bdf, int region_num)
}
} else {
paddr = &pci_bios_mem_addr;
- if (ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size >= BUILD_PCIMEM_END) {
+ if (ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size < *paddr ||
+ ALIGN(*paddr, size) + size >= BUILD_PCIMEM_END) {
dprintf(1,
"mem region of (bdf 0x%x bar %d) can't be mapped. "
"increase BUILD_PCIMEM_SIZE and recompile. size %x\n",
@@ -116,12 +118,8 @@ static int pci_bios_allocate_region(u16 bdf, int region_num)
int is_64bit = !(val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) &&
(val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_MASK) == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
- if (is_64bit) {
- if (size > 0) {
- pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs + 4, 0);
- } else {
- pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs + 4, ~0);
- }
+ if (is_64bit && size > 0) {
+ pci_config_writel(bdf, ofs + 4, 0);
}
return is_64bit;
}
--
yamahata
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-20 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 16:41 [Qemu-devel] Unusual physical address when using 64-bit BAR Cam Macdonell
2010-06-11 17:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cam Macdonell
2010-06-15 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-24 21:51 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-27 8:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 20:38 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-29 6:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 17:48 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-30 3:29 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-13 20:05 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-13 20:41 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-13 22:48 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-14 2:52 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-14 15:10 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-20 9:52 ` Isaku Yamahata [this message]
2010-07-21 3:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-21 3:49 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-08-24 16:52 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-08-25 2:21 ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-08-27 19:35 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-08-30 2:36 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100720095223.GC24957@valinux.co.jp \
--to=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cam@cs.ualberta.ca \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).