From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46418 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OcH4M-0003g1-Pb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:09:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1OcH4L-0005gb-Il
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:09:38 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:40968)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <hch@lst.de>)
	id 1OcH4L-0005gF-5h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:09:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:09:35 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: default to 0 minimal / optiomal I/O
	size
Message-ID: <20100723120934.GA10707@lst.de>
References: <20100723073504.GA28166@lst.de> <4C4973E4.5030502@redhat.com>
	<20100723113046.GA8898@lst.de> <4C498382.2020904@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C498382.2020904@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I've applied the patch to the block branch. This is something for 0.13,
> too, I suppose?

Yes, I think so.  It's easy enough and the broken guest already are in
the wild.