From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38373 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oeprh-000594-Lv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:43:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oeprf-0002Xs-VV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:43:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oeprf-0002XS-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:43:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:43:01 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] savevm: prevent snapshot overwriting and generate a default name Message-ID: <20100730104301.50b3f1a1@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1280345424-12918-1-git-send-email-miguel.filho@gmail.com> <1280345424-12918-4-git-send-email-miguel.filho@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, clalance@redhat.com, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:34:57 +0200 Markus Armbruster wrote: > Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho writes: > > > This patch address two issues. > > > > 1) When savevm is run using an previously saved snapshot id or name, it will > > delete the original and create a new one, using the same id and name and not > > prompting the user of what just happened. > > > > This behaviour is not good, IMHO. > > Debatable. Automatically destroying previously saved data without any notice seems a quite bad behavior to me. > > We add a '-f' parameter to savevm, to really force that to happen, in case the > > user really wants to. > > Incompatible change, looks like it'll break libvirt. Doesn't mean we > can't do it ever, but right now may not be the best time. Perhaps after > savevm & friends are fully functional in QMP. Chris, could you please check whether this impacts libvirt?