From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51854 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfE0B-00065G-H9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:29:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1OfE0A-0001XP-Ex
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:29:31 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:43485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1OfE0A-0001X4-9t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:29:30 -0400
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:29:21 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Do not try loading option ROM for hotplug
	PCI device in pc-0.11 compat mode
Message-ID: <20100731152921.GL20459@volta.aurel32.net>
References: <1279900598-8432-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
	<20100730210847.GD20459@volta.aurel32.net>
	<4C53E9FD.4070109@redhat.com>
	<20100731141944.GC31640@hall.aurel32.net>
	<4C5435C5.2040402@redhat.com>
	<20100731151318.GF31640@hall.aurel32.net>
	<4C543F7E.5020300@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C543F7E.5020300@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex.Williamson@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 05:21:34PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 07/31/10 17:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:40:05PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> If you want that, please do it in a separate patch for the entire file,
> >> otherwise it will never become consistent. However it doesn't change the
> >> issue either that putting braces around a single line like this is bad
> >> coding style.
> > 
> > We got this discussions numerous times, and I am not going to start it
> > again. If you want to see the patch applied, just follow the rules.
> > 
> 
> Then  I would like to know why you do not apply this silly rule to every
> patch submitted. There's patches going in almost every day that doesn't
> use this hopeless formatting.
> 

Because not everyone try to enforce the rules.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net