qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100826125751.GT10499@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C766402.2080804@codemonkey.ws>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:54:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 02:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>   Hi,
> >>
> >>>Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
> >>>lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
> >>>trying.
> >>Didn't try win7, but for winxp it is a *huge* difference.
> >>
> >On which HW? My guess is this is because of tpr patching.
> 
> Does Windows 7 hit the TPR heavily?  I thought all modern versions
> of Windows significantly reduced their interactions with the TPR.
> 
Windows 7 doesn't. tpr patching explains only winxp slowdown.
--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-26 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 19:37 [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? walt
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-25 23:09   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
2010-08-25 23:28     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26  7:53       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26  7:59         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26  9:59           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26 10:24             ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-26 10:25               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 11:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 12:54           ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 12:57             ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-08-26 21:57       ` walt
2010-08-29 15:02         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100826125751.GT10499@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=w41ter@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).