From: Adam Lackorzynski <adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Handle 'smc' as an undefined instruction
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:11:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902231124.GE23301@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100902221423.GB9117@archaic.org.uk>
On Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 23:14:23 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:40:50PM +0200, Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> > + case 7:
> > + /* SMC? */
> > + if ((insn & 0xfffffff0) == 0xe1600070) {
> > + goto illegal_op;
> > + }
> > + /* bkpt */
>
> This doesn't look right to me. SMC in the ARM encoding is a standard
> conditionalised instruction, so you shouldn't be mandating that the
> cond field is 0xe.
True.
> I think the correct way to distinguish BKPT from SMC is to look at
> bits [22..21] of the instruction: 01 for BKPT, 11 for SMC and
> other combinations are UNDEFINED. This is in 'op1' at this point
> in the code...
target-arm: Handle 'smc' as an undefined instruction
Refine check on bkpt so that smc is handled as an undefined instruction.
Signed-off-by: Adam Lackorzynski <adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
---
target-arm/translate.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/translate.c b/target-arm/translate.c
index 6fcdd7e..fac4f5d 100644
--- a/target-arm/translate.c
+++ b/target-arm/translate.c
@@ -6346,7 +6346,11 @@ static void disas_arm_insn(CPUState * env, DisasContext *s)
dead_tmp(tmp2);
store_reg(s, rd, tmp);
break;
- case 7: /* bkpt */
+ case 7:
+ if (op1 != 1) {
+ goto illegal_op;
+ }
+ /* bkpt */
gen_set_condexec(s);
gen_set_pc_im(s->pc - 4);
gen_exception(EXCP_BKPT);
--
1.7.1
Thanks,
Adam
--
Adam adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 21:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Handle 'smc' as an undefined instruction Adam Lackorzynski
2010-09-02 22:14 ` Peter Maydell
2010-09-02 23:11 ` Adam Lackorzynski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-04 22:21 Adam Lackorzynski
2010-11-14 17:10 ` Peter Maydell
2010-09-25 8:50 Adam Lackorzynski
2010-09-02 20:27 Adam Lackorzynski
2010-09-02 21:19 ` Stefan Weil
2010-06-04 8:59 Adam Lackorzynski
2010-05-10 23:01 Adam Lackorzynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902231124.GE23301@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
--to=adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).