[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Chris Wright]

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

thanks,
-chris

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Avi Kivity]

  On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>

nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but 
there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve Intel to 
speed things up?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
> 
> nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve
> Intel to speed things up?

Hotplug

> -- 
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Anthony Liguori]

On 09/20/2010 02:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>>   On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>      
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>>        
>> nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but
>> there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve
>> Intel to speed things up?
>>      
> Hotplug
>    

Drive caching.  Discussion on the mailing list but regardless of my own 
opinions of what it should be, we really need to have a clearly defined 
set of guarantees for all of the caching modes.  This is something I get 
asked very frequently about from end users because there's lack of 
clarity about what each of the caching options do with respect to data 
integrity.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>    
>> -- 
>> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>      
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>    

[Qemu-devel] RE: KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Nakajima, Jun]

Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:

>   On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>> 
>  nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but
> there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> speed things up?
> 
Hi, Avi

What are you looking for?

Jun
___
Intel Open Source Technology Center

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21

[Avi Kivity]

  On 09/21/2010 05:37 AM, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
>
> >    On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>  Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>
> >   nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but
> >  there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve Intel to
> >  speed things up?
> >
> Hi, Avi
>
> What are you looking for?
>
>

Help in getting the patchset in.  Reviewing is always appreciated (while 
it tends to increase the time, the result is usually better).  If we can 
find a way to share the work, even better.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.