From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56091 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyTw9-0006ef-PD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:20:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyTw7-0006Ct-Jh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:20:57 -0400 Received: from moo.pl ([217.149.240.132]:43744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyTw7-0006CP-DT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:20:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:20:49 +0200 From: Leszek Urbanski Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity Message-ID: <20100922182049.GA29263@moo.pl> References: <20100922171832.GA28721@moo.pl> <4C9A3FAF.9090503@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C9A3FAF.9090503@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org <4C9A3FAF.9090503@codemonkey.ws>; from Anthony Liguori on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:41:03 -0500 > Is the guest kernel vanilla 2.6.32.22 or is it a distro kernel? If the > later, what distro? > > The difference in the two invocations is that with the -device syntax, > you're getting offload features enabled. It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23 (based on 2.6.32.21). If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload options and check which one causes it. -- Leszek "Tygrys" Urbanski, SCSA, SCNA "Unix-to-Unix Copy Program;" said PDP-1. "You will never find a more wretched hive of bugs and flamers. We must be cautious." -- DECWARS http://cygnus.moo.pl/ -- Cygnus High Altitude Balloon