Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] virtio: Use ioeventfd for virtqueue notify

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:01:14AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 03:04 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 10/04/2010 03:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 10/03/2010 09:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>This is using eventfd as well.
> >>>Sorry, I meant irqfd.
> >>
> >>I've tried using irqfd in userspace.  It hurts performance quite
> >>a bit compared to doing an ioctl so I would suspect this too.
> >>
> >>A last_used_idx or similar mechanism should help performance
> >>quite a bit on top of ioeventfd too.
> >>
> >
> >Any idea why?  While irqfd does quite a bit of extra locking, it
> >shouldn't be that bad.
> 
> Not really.  It was somewhat counter intuitive.
> 
> A worthwhile experiment might be to do some layering violations and
> have vhost do an irq injection via an ioctl and see what the
> performance delta is.

I think you don't even need to try that hard.
Just comment this line:
//   proxy->pci_dev.msix_mask_notifier = virtio_pci_mask_notifier;
this is what switches to irqfd when msi vector is unmasked.


>  I suspect it could give vhost a nice boost.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori