From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40259 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8vBD-0004GH-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:27:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vB5-0006NG-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:27:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vB5-0006Mv-3n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:27:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:27:23 +0200 From: Alon Levy Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] add usb_detach and usb_attach (v3) Message-ID: <20101021132723.GE22958@playa.tlv.redhat.com> References: <1287642991-21114-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4CC03A2D.9030105@redhat.com> <4CC03C6F.4020304@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC03C6F.4020304@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:13:19AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 10/21/2010 08:03 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >On 10/21/10 08:36, Alon Levy wrote: > >>v2->v3 changes: > >> * add configure parameter > >> * fix docs > >> > >>v2 message: > >>This patchset uses id like device_del for attaching/detaching usb > >>devices. The first two patches ready the way: > >> 1. makes qdev_find_recursive non static and in qdev.h > >> 2. adds a usb_device_by_id which goes over the usb buses calling > >> qdev_find_recursive > >> 3. adds the commands that use usb_device_by_id > >> > >>Alon Levy (3): > >> qdev: make qdev_find_recursive public > >> usb: add public usb_device_by_id > >> monitor: add usb_attach and usb_detach (v2) > >> > > > >Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann > > Okay, I am still confused about the use-case for this and I don't > see any further explanation in the commit messages. I've seen > "debugging" but can you be a bit more specific about which cases > it's needed for? To elaborate a little more, when using a certificates based card there is no hardware event (i.e. removing/inserting the physical card) that causes a usb_detach/attach to the card (both in passthru and emulated), but otoh certificates is good for testing since it decouples it from NSS/tcp. So I needed some way to emulate an insert/remove, and I saw usb_del, which was pretty close, and voila. This is not the same as card remove/reinsert, but it is exactly what will happen to the guest when spicec connects/disconnects, since I detach devices on disconnect and attach on connect. > > This is just adding a HMP command. Is that the right approach or > was that an unintentional consequence of rebasing post-HMP/QMP > split? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > > >cheers, > > Gerd > > > > > >