qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] First part of autoconfy series: cleanup tests/
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:44:55 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101022114455.255d9a75@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC193DA.50904@redhat.com>

On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:38:34 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 10/22/2010 03:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:18:34 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> This is a small start from the autoconfy configure series.  Actually,
> >> this part is almost completely new.  It cleans up the tests Makefile
> >> so that the i386-linux-user testsuite's Makefile targets are more
> >> easily extensible and can work wherever a compiler for i386 is
> >> installed.  In the future this could be extended to ARM and
> >> MIPS targets.
> >
> > This is unrelated to this series, but something that would be very good to
> > have would be to move all check- programs to tests/ (or check/) and make them
> > part of 'make test' or introduce a new 'make check'.
> 
> Right, I thought about that too.  The main hurdle is that: 1) right now 
> almost every test in "make test" is failing;

Yeah, just saw that.

> 2) the testsuite run by 
> "make test" is very noisy, does not create logs, etc.  If we could use 
> autotest... :)
> 
> We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply 
> call all of them.

That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check
to do all our unit-testing, then it would be easier to setup autotest
around it.

But we'll have to port current tests to it, of course.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-22 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-21  8:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] First part of autoconfy series: cleanup tests/ Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] unbreak "make" from tests directory Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] unbreak "make" from vpath-built " Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] disable test_enter on i386, it is broken Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] make runcom compile on recent distributions Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] fix test_path Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21  8:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] rewrite i386 tests Makefile Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-22 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] First part of autoconfy series: cleanup tests/ Luiz Capitulino
2010-10-22 13:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-22 13:44     ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2010-10-22 13:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-22 13:55         ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-10-23 14:54 ` Blue Swirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101022114455.255d9a75@doriath \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).