From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43790 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9HvZ-0003CG-1M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9HvX-0003TO-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:45:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9HvX-0003Sx-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:44:59 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MDiwbg031398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:44:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:44:55 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] First part of autoconfy series: cleanup tests/ Message-ID: <20101022114455.255d9a75@doriath> In-Reply-To: <4CC193DA.50904@redhat.com> References: <1287649120-30740-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20101022112634.72b672df@doriath> <4CC193DA.50904@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:38:34 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/22/2010 03:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:18:34 +0200 > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > >> This is a small start from the autoconfy configure series. Actually, > >> this part is almost completely new. It cleans up the tests Makefile > >> so that the i386-linux-user testsuite's Makefile targets are more > >> easily extensible and can work wherever a compiler for i386 is > >> installed. In the future this could be extended to ARM and > >> MIPS targets. > > > > This is unrelated to this series, but something that would be very good to > > have would be to move all check- programs to tests/ (or check/) and make them > > part of 'make test' or introduce a new 'make check'. > > Right, I thought about that too. The main hurdle is that: 1) right now > almost every test in "make test" is failing; Yeah, just saw that. > 2) the testsuite run by > "make test" is very noisy, does not create logs, etc. If we could use > autotest... :) > > We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply > call all of them. That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check to do all our unit-testing, then it would be easier to setup autotest around it. But we'll have to port current tests to it, of course.