From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54497 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAjbY-0001b2-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:30:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAjbX-0001Zd-C7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:30:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAjbX-0001ZZ-3D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:30:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:30:16 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Keep track of ISA ports ISA device is using in qdev. Message-ID: <20101026133016.GH26191@redhat.com> References: <1288090091-25874-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1288090091-25874-2-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <4CC6D6BA.8000007@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC6D6BA.8000007@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:25:14AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 10/26/2010 05:48 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >Store all io ports used by device in ISADevice structure. > > > >Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > >--- > > hw/cs4231a.c | 1 + > > hw/fdc.c | 3 +++ > > hw/gus.c | 4 ++++ > > hw/ide/isa.c | 2 ++ > > hw/isa-bus.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > hw/isa.h | 4 ++++ > > hw/m48t59.c | 1 + > > hw/mc146818rtc.c | 1 + > > hw/ne2000-isa.c | 3 +++ > > hw/parallel.c | 5 +++++ > > hw/pckbd.c | 3 +++ > > hw/sb16.c | 4 ++++ > > hw/serial.c | 1 + > > 13 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/hw/cs4231a.c b/hw/cs4231a.c > >index 4d5ce5c..598f032 100644 > >--- a/hw/cs4231a.c > >+++ b/hw/cs4231a.c > >@@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ static int cs4231a_initfn (ISADevice *dev) > > isa_init_irq (dev,&s->pic, s->irq); > > > > for (i = 0; i< 4; i++) { > >+ isa_init_ioport(dev, i); > > register_ioport_write (s->port + i, 1, 1, cs_write, s); > > register_ioport_read (s->port + i, 1, 1, cs_read, s); > > A better way to do this would be to introduce isa_register_ioport. > That what Markus proposed and, in principal, I agree. I would like to keep that out from this path series, but if it is not a big churn and maintainers insists I can look at it. I need to do something anyway while Markus is cooling down :) > We can take Avi's series first since that probably makes this easier > to implement. > It is ready to go in, no? -- Gleb.