From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44112 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGpoN-0001QE-M3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:20:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1PGpoM-0003Fv-SC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:20:47 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50474)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1PGpoM-0003Fq-LU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:20:46 -0500
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:20:38 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20101112092038.GI7631@redhat.com>
References: <20101112024710.31423.99667.stgit@s20.home>
	<20101112025602.31423.95572.stgit@s20.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101112025602.31423.95572.stgit@s20.home>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/8] device-assignment: Move PCI
 capabilities to match physical hardware
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Now that common PCI code doesn't have a hangup on capabilities
> being contiguous,

Hmm, this comment confused me : there's no requirement of
contigious allocations in current code in pci.c, is there?

-- 
MST