From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51855 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHjb5-00039Y-EM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:54:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHjb4-0005OB-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:54:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHjb3-0005O7-LP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:54:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:54:32 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20101114205432.GB14828@redhat.com> References: <1289749181-12070-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1289749181-12070-16-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 15/15] Pass boot device list to firmware. List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:49:59PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > > --- > > =A0hw/fw_cfg.c | =A0 14 ++++++++++++++ > > =A0hw/fw_cfg.h | =A0 =A04 +++- > > =A0sysemu.h =A0 =A0| =A0 =A01 + > > =A0vl.c =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| =A0 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++++++++ > > =A04 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/fw_cfg.c b/hw/fw_cfg.c > > index 7b9434f..f6a67db 100644 > > --- a/hw/fw_cfg.c > > +++ b/hw/fw_cfg.c > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct FWCfgState { > > =A0 =A0 FWCfgFiles *files; > > =A0 =A0 uint16_t cur_entry; > > =A0 =A0 uint32_t cur_offset; > > + =A0 =A0Notifier machine_ready; > > =A0}; > > > > =A0static void fw_cfg_write(FWCfgState *s, uint8_t value) > > @@ -315,6 +316,15 @@ int fw_cfg_add_file(FWCfgState *s, =A0const char= *filename, uint8_t *data, > > =A0 =A0 return 1; > > =A0} > > > > +static void fw_cfg_machine_ready(struct Notifier* n) > > +{ > > + =A0 =A0uint32_t len; > > + =A0 =A0char *bootindex =3D get_boot_devices_list(&len); > > + > > + =A0 =A0fw_cfg_add_bytes(container_of(n, FWCfgState, machine_ready), > > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 FW_CFG_BOOTINDEX, (uint8_t*= )bootindex, len); >=20 > I started to implement this to OpenBIOS but I noticed a small issue. > First the first byte must be read to determine length. Then the read > routine will be called again to read the correct amount of bytes. This > would work, but since there is no shortage of IDs, I'd prefer a system > where one ID is used to query the length and another ID is used to > read the data, without the length byte. This is similar how command > line, initrd etc. are handled. >=20 > This would have the advantage that since fw_cfg uses little endian > format, the length value would easily scale to for example 64 bits to > support terabytes of boot device lists. ;-) Yea. Let's just print # of devices as a property, in ASCII. No endian-ness, no nothing. Also - can we just NULL-terminate each ID?