From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36631 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIQnt-00066w-GK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:02:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PIQnr-000645-7j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:02:53 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48330)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PIQnq-000641-T2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:02:51 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:02:46 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20101116190246.GA27851@redhat.com>
References: <1289749181-12070-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<1289749181-12070-16-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTimkVuaj4vdc9e5GBb=Sh5rBhOduoqUFLWzeMj5G@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101115084242.GG7948@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTi=pg29pbC84oh5x3Tmg7dr5mtFG7TD=D_W14a3C@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101116141112.GS7948@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTinffFMw3WWUX=unvP07Y6CmFEJt56JA80T3h=At@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinffFMw3WWUX=unvP07Y6CmFEJt56JA80T3h=At@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 15/15] Pass boot device list to firmware.
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> Perhaps the FW path should use device class names if no name is specif=
ied.
> > What do you mean by "device class name". We can do something like this:
> > if (dev->child_bus.lh_first)
> > =9A =9A =9A =9Areturn dev->child_bus.lh_first->info->name;
> >
> > i.e if there is child bus use its bus name as fw name. This will make
> > all pci devices to have "pci" as fw name automatically. The problem is
> > that theoretically same device can provide different buses.
>=20
> I meant PCI class name, like "display" for display controllers,
> "network" for NICs etc.
>=20
That is what my pci bus related patch is doing already.

> >> I'll try Sparc32 to see how this fits there.
>=20
> Except bootindex is not implemented for SCSI.
Will look into adding it.

--
			Gleb.