From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bernhard Kohl <bernhard.kohl@nsn.com>, mtosatti@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH comment tweaked] msix: allow byte and word reading from mmio
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117142816.GA15204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE2B49A.7000701@nsn.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Bernhard Kohl wrote:
> Am 16.11.2010 14:14, schrieb mst@redhat.com:
> >Although explicitly disallowed by the PCI spec, some guests read a
> >single byte or word from mmio. Likely a guest OS bug, but I have an OS
> >which reads single bytes and it works fine on real hardware.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl<bernhard.kohl@nsn.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
> >---
> >
> >OK so it could like something like the below.
>
> Yes, this looks good for me.
>
> > However, my question is:
> >do we need to put this in or can the guest simply be fixed?
>
> I tried to locate the code where the readw occurs,
> but not successful. It only occurs during booting our OS,
> and the virtio-net driver seems to be OK. With 4 virtio
> NICs we have the following readw accesses, thats all!
> 3 accesses per NIC and the first NIC appears twice.
>
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000008
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000018
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000028
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000008
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000018
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000028
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000008
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000018
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000028
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000008
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000018
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000028
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000008
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000018
> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000028
>
> Is it possible to add a stack back tace printing to the
> readw function?
See some words of wisdom from Marcelo (this appliues to qemu-kvm.git):
<mst> marcelot, there is a guest that misbehaves
<mst> marcelot, so we get an fprintf in qemu
<mst> marcelot, but we don't know which place in guest caused the
problem, no backtrace, etc
<marcelot> mst, print guest RIP there?
<mst> marcelot, 1. how to?
<marcelot> mst, cpu_synchronize_state(cpu_single_env) + print (env->eip)
<marcelot> s/env/cpu_single_env/
<mst> marcelot, 2. can we also make it so that when io completes, guest
stops with backtrace in gdb?
<marcelot> mst, see kvm_show_code in qemu-kvm-x86.c
<marcelot> mst, either add a breakpoint there, or call abort() and gdb
core later
<mst> marcelot, abort will exit qemu though. gdb core will give me qemu
backtrace, not guest one, right?
<mst> marcelot, I would like kvm to pretend it hit a breakpoint
<mst> marcelot, or a segfault ... something
<marcelot> mst, well, vmstop() then. you can see guest RIP from there.
<marcelot> mst, yes gdb core will give qemu backtrace. inject a #GP to
see guest backtrace (see kvm_put_vcpu_events in qemu-kvm-x86.c
<marcelot> )
--
MST
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH comment tweaked] msix: allow byte and word reading from mmio mst
2010-11-16 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Bernhard Kohl
2010-11-17 14:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-17 16:12 ` Bernhard Kohl
2010-11-17 16:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-24 14:35 ` Bernhard Kohl
2010-11-17 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101117142816.GA15204@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bernhard.kohl@nsn.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).