From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44809 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJ0Oz-0000c0-3G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:03:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ0Oy-0006OF-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:03:32 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ0Ox-0006O8-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:03:31 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAI93UBO021090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:03:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:03:21 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] spice: add qxl device Message-ID: <20101118090321.GD16832@redhat.com> References: <1288704898-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20101116174306.GC4077@redhat.com> <4CE3D875.9020701@redhat.com> <20101117135842.GA13690@redhat.com> <4CE3F2CD.4030701@redhat.com> <20101117164244.GE27909@redhat.com> <4CE40AAF.7090202@redhat.com> <20101117180008.GE29556@redhat.com> <20101118080935.GW7948@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101118080935.GW7948@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > >> If so: does qemu > > > >>emulate this correctly? > > > > > > > >It mostly does. > > > > > > I doubt it actually enables/disables the legacy vga ports. > > > > I'll check when I have the time. We can fix it if it doesn't, > > > So many guests (all of them?) just assume that vga ports and > framebuffer is there. Why do you think they disable io memory then? > So what "fixing" this will buy us? Besides spec compliancy, you mean? Ability to support multiple VGA cards. That's how it works I think: BIOS enables IO on the primary VGA device only. > -- > Gleb.