From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56804 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNeFL-00036x-He for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:25:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNSnT-0002uJ-Ql for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:11:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNSnT-0002np-Ie for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:11:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:10:32 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20101130161032.GF20536@redhat.com> References: <20101124104035.GB23493@redhat.com> <4CF46012.2060804@codemonkey.ws> <4CF50410.3080305@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 02/10] Add buffered_file_internal constant List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > Basically our bitmap handling code is "exponential" on memory size, I didn't realize this. What makes it exponential?