From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51801 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNlYh-0002r9-F7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:13:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNlYg-0000dV-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:13:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNlYg-0000cz-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:13:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:42:56 +0530 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 7/7] virtio-console: Enable port throttling when chardev is slow to consume data Message-ID: <20101201121256.GD2962@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <201012011130.58630.paul@codesourcery.com> <20101201114837.GB2962@amit-x200.redhat.com> <201012011159.35947.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012011159.35947.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann On (Wed) Dec 01 2010 [11:59:35], Paul Brook wrote: > > > > - qemu_chr_write(vcon->chr, buf, len); > > > > + ret = qemu_chr_write(vcon->chr, buf, len); > > > > + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { > > > > + virtio_serial_throttle_port(port, true); > > > > + } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > This looks wrong. It will loose data in the case of a partial write > > > (i.e. ret < len) > > > > That doesn't happen currently (qemu_chr_write doesn't return a value > 0 > > but < len). > > > > I had code in there to handle it, but that would change behaviour for > > current users of qemu_chr_write(), which is a risk. > > Doesn't that make the code almost completely pointless? Not really -- I did have code for partial writes, but removed it before this submission (had it in previous versions). The (new) do_send loop: len = len1; while (len > 0) { ret = write(fd, buf, len); if (ret < 0) { if (errno == EAGAIN && nonblock) { return -EAGAIN; } if (errno != EINTR && errno != EAGAIN) { return -1; } } else if (ret == 0) { break; } else { buf += ret; len -= ret; } } when there's a partial write, it tries to do a write again, which will fail with -EAGAIN. (However I might be completely missing the data that didn't get written as a result of that partial write, so the output gets corrupted. I guess I still need to handle partial writes for that.) Amit