From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55940 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUboD-0001p3-Ue for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:13:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUboC-00081j-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:13:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUboC-00081b-Dt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:13:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:49:48 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20101220084948.GA16707@amt.cnet> References: <20101208170858.GA10056@amt.cnet> <20101212191129.GA20312@morn.localdomain> <20101212194916.GD28665@redhat.com> <20101212195745.GA23475@morn.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101212195745.GA23475@morn.localdomain> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] seabios: acpi: add _RMV control method for PCI devices List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin O'Connor , Avi Kivity Cc: seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:57:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:29PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:59PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Use _RMV method to indicate whether device can be removed. > > > > > > > > Data is retrieved from QEMU via I/O port 0xae0c. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti > > > > > > Thanks Marcelo, > > > > > > Can you add acked-bys from the qemu/kvm maintaners? > > > > > Marcelo is kvm maintainer ;) FWIW I tested this with Windows 7 & XP > > and it works as expected. The patch relies on patch not yes excepted > > to qemu though. > > Yeah - I know - but I figured I'd ask for concensus before committing. > :-) > > The committing of seabios patches that have a dependency on qemu/kvm > is an area that I think could be better clarified. I'm thinking that > if the seabios part depends on something in qemu/kvm then we should > have the corresponding kvm/qemu maintaners "ack" it. > > -Kevin Avi, are you OK with this patch ? Yes, perhaps it all (including PCI hotplug controller) should be using something else than hardcoded IO ports, but thats what we have now.