From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40205 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUhCy-0005kg-65 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:59:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUhCx-00087q-5P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:59:28 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:35429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUhCw-00087E-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:59:27 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:59:19 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] Megasas HBA emulation and SCSI update v.3 Message-ID: <20101220145919.GA11455@lst.de> References: <1290597370-21365-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290597370-21365-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org, kraxel@redhat.com Any chance you could resubmit the remaining patches after addressing the outstanding comments? We'll really need the scsi changes to move forward without introducing conflicts.