From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39648 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PV77M-0001e4-K9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:39:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <galibert@dspnet.fr>) id 1PV77H-0001LX-IC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:39:24 -0500
Received: from dspnet.fr ([188.165.44.67]:58978)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <galibert@dspnet.fr>) id 1PV77H-0001LI-9g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:39:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:39:15 +0100
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Where is ehci hiding ?
Message-ID: <20101221183915.GA33848@dspnet.fr>
References: <20101221151625.GA96057@dspnet.fr>
 <4D10D340.6000006@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D10D340.6000006@cisco.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "David S. Ahern" <daahern@cisco.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:18:08AM -0700, David S. Ahern wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/21/10 08:16, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > 
> >   Hi all,
> > 
> > Google sees patches to hw/usb-ehci.c from time to time, in
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg37741.html for
> > instance.  Where is that code hiding, since I just can't find it in
> > the git tree?
> 
> git://git.kiszka.org/qemu.git ehci
> 
> Not much has been done in the past 4+ months.

Thanks.  Any idea what's missing to get it into mainline?  Reading
what little discussions I could find was unenlightening.

  OG.