From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54526 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ParVI-0005Fu-D1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:11:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ParVF-0003b5-FZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:11:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ParVF-0003au-7o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:11:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:11:18 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20110106151118.GA17230@redhat.com> References: <20110101140620.GL3615@hall.aurel32.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Usefulness of the bug tracker List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:28:46AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > The real problem is that we're collecting bugs but not effectively > investigating and fixing them. Can Launchpad send out automatic bug > summary emails once every week/two weeks/month? Launchpad is at least part of the problem. Users find it without going through the wiki and file Ubuntu/Debian specific bugs there. A bugzilla on qemu.org or some such place would make people look at the documentation to file, and preferably would not be associated with a distro to avoid confusion. -- MST