From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:46:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126134601.GE12805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110126131748.GA4395@valinux.co.jp>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:17:48PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> The bit should be writable, not w1c.
>
> 3.2.5.18 bridge control register
> bit 11 Discard Timer SERR# Enable
>
> When set to 1, this bit enables the bridge to assert SERR# on
> the primary interface when either the Primary Discard Timer or
> Secondary Discard Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction is
> discarded from a queue in the bridge. The default state of this
> bit must be 0 after reset.
> 0 - do not assert SERR# on the primary interface as
> a result of the expiration of either the Primary
> Discard Timer or Secondary Discard Timer
> 1 - assert SERR# on the primary interface if either
> the Primary Discard Timer or Secondary Discard
> Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction
Yes but
#define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS 0x400 /* Discard timer status */
So this is bit 10?
BTW, how about moving these bits to linux and then to our pci_regs.h?
>S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:45:27PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > pci_init_wmask_bridge() incorrectly set w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL].
> > > This patch removes the line otherwise the assert(!(wmask & w1cmask)) in
> > > pci_default_write_config() is hit.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> >
> > Maybe clear in wmask? This bit really should be w1c, should it not?
> >
> > > ---
> > > hw/pci.c | 4 ----
> > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > > index b8f5385..79a46e7 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > > @@ -643,10 +643,6 @@ static void pci_init_wmask_bridge(PCIDevice *d)
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SEC_DISCARD |
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS |
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_SERR);
> > > - /* Below does not do anything as we never set this bit, put here for
> > > - * completeness. */
> > > - pci_set_word(d->w1cmask + PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL,
> > > - PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int pci_init_multifunction(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev)
> > > --
> > > 1.7.1.1
> >
>
> --
> yamahata
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 9:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 12:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-26 13:17 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-01-26 13:53 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-27 3:54 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126134601.GE12805@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).