From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34004 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkFjh-0005zI-QB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:53:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1PkFjg-0007eL-ME
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:53:33 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53921)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1PkFjg-0007a3-EB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:53:32 -0500
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:53:21 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 1
Message-ID: <20110201105321.0d2901b6@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>
References: <m3hbcpgzm0.fsf@trasno.org> <4D46FB28.9040801@siemens.com>
	<4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, quintela@redhat.com

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:39:22 -0600
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:

> On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >    
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering.
> >>
> >>      
> >   o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination
> >    
> 
>   o QMP support status for 0.14.  Luiz and I already chatted about it 
> today but would be good to discuss in the call just to see if anyone has 
> opinions.  Basically, declare it fully supported with a few minor 
> caveats (like human-monitor-passthrough is no more supported than the 
> actual monitor and recommendations about how to deal with devices in the 
> device tree).

o Summer of code 2011

> 
> Reminder: tomorrow is 0.14 stable fork.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> > Jan
> >
> >    
> 
>