From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49387 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkeLV-0001EZ-6j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:10:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PkeLQ-0007Hr-4C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:10:13 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45461)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1PkeLP-0007Hb-Sz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:10:08 -0500
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:10:04 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv8 12/16] Add bootindex parameter to
	net/block/fd device
Message-ID: <20110202151004.GM14984@redhat.com>
References: <1291808109-22563-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<1291808109-22563-13-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<m3k4hi8ofc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3k4hi8ofc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, kevin@koconnor.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:08:07PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > If bootindex is specified on command line a string that describes device
> > in firmware readable way is added into sorted list. Later this list will
> > be passed into firmware to control boot order.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> 
> Just noticed something that slipped through review:
> 
> [...]
> > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> > index 2cd263e..dadc161 100644
> > --- a/vl.c
> > +++ b/vl.c
> [...]
> > @@ -693,6 +704,35 @@ static void restore_boot_devices(void *opaque)
> >      qemu_free(standard_boot_devices);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void add_boot_device_path(int32_t bootindex, DeviceState *dev,
> > +                          const char *suffix)
> > +{
> > +    FWBootEntry *node, *i;
> > +
> > +    if (bootindex < 0) {
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    assert(dev != NULL || suffix != NULL);
> > +
> > +    node = qemu_mallocz(sizeof(FWBootEntry));
> > +    node->bootindex = bootindex;
> > +    node->suffix = strdup(suffix);
> 
> qemu_strdup()?
> 
Yap. Will fix.

> > +    node->dev = dev;
> > +
> > +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(i, &fw_boot_order, link) {
> > +        if (i->bootindex == bootindex) {
> > +            fprintf(stderr, "Two devices with same boot index %d\n", bootindex);
> > +            exit(1);
> > +        } else if (i->bootindex < bootindex) {
> > +            continue;
> > +        }
> > +        QTAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(i, node, link);
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +    QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&fw_boot_order, node, link);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void numa_add(const char *optarg)
> >  {
> >      char option[128];

--
			Gleb.