From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39919 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl2a2-0002hK-VK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:02:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl2a0-0003ZX-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:02:49 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl2a0-0003Z0-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:02:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:02:40 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vnc: Fix password expiration through 'change vnc ""' Message-ID: <20110203170239.GK19545@redhat.com> References: <1296506599-7126-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20110203162921.GJ19545@redhat.com> <4D4AD967.9000107@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4AD967.9000107@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Anthony Liguori , Gerd Hoffman , Neil Wilson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:35:51AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/03/2011 10:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:43:19PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >>commit 52c18be9e99dabe295321153fda7fce9f76647ac introduced a regression in the > >>change vnc password command that changed the behavior of setting the VNC > >>password to an empty string from disabling login to disabling authentication. > >> > >>This commit refactors the code to eliminate this overloaded semantics in > >>vnc_display_password and instead introduces the vnc_display_disable_login. The > >>monitor implementation then determines the behavior of an empty or missing > >>string. > >Personally I think this is a little overkill& just reverting the > >original patch was fine, but from a functional POV your patch > >produces the same results, so I won't argue. > > For 0.15, I'd like to introduce a new set of commands such that we > don't multiplex the change command anymore. This refactoring lays > the ground work for that. > > For instance, if you created a block device with the name 'vnc', > you'd get very unexpected results! Multiplexing based on special > values on top of existing commands is pretty evil. Doesn't Gerd's 'set_password' command already replace the functionality of the 'change vnc' command. So we should likely declare 'change vnc' as deprecated in 0.14 and remove it in 0.16 Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|