From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56211 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlOki-00045b-A4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:43:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1PlOkY-0003w2-2f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:43:18 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11110)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1PlOkX-0003vp-PK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:43:09 -0500
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:42:54 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] Missing patches (mostly fixes)
Message-ID: <20110204144254.546fb2a1@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <m3ei7nvmz1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <4D49B04F.80201@mail.berlios.de>
	<4D4BF160.9040500@codemonkey.ws>
	<m3ei7nvmz1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:27:46 +0100
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:

> Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:
> 
> > On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> [...]
> >> [PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
> >> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
> 
> >> [PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
> >> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79946/)
> >
> > Luiz
> 
> I wouldn't bother with the second one for 0.14.  Yes, we're reading
> lines from a file with %s, but it's a fixed file with known contents, no
> long lines, and we're reading it in a test program only developers ever
> use.

Agreed.

> 
> As to the first one, Luiz has never touched that file.  Neither have I,
> and it's not obvious to me why it should go into 0.14.
> 
> [...]
>