From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37251 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlOrz-00076X-Hl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:50:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlOry-0005RN-6p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:50:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlOrx-0005R9-Oc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:50:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:37:27 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20110204163727.GA19469@amt.cnet> References: <20110204135420.GA11160@amt.cnet> <4D4C294C.4050208@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4C294C.4050208@web.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] [uq/master] Patch queue, part II List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Hidetoshi Seto , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Huang Ying , Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jin Dongming On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:29:00PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-02-04 14:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:15:40PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Version 2 of part II. Changes: > >> - Fixed "Unconditionally reenter kernel after IO exits" to take > >> self-INIT into account > >> - Fixed misplaced hunk in "Fix race between timer signals and vcpu > >> entry under !IOTHREAD" (rebase artifact) > >> - Factor out block_synchronous_signals (analogue to block_io_signals) > >> - Additional fix to break out of SMP VCPU loop on pending IO event > >> - Fork qemu_kvm_init_cpu_signals over CONFIG_IOTHREAD > >> - Additional cleanup, flattening the main loop > >> > >> Hope I addressed all review comments (except for passing env to > >> qemu_cpu_kick_self which I think is better as it is). > > > > 1 and 24 rejected, applied the remaining ones, thanks. > > 23 is missing as well. You want me to post the last two directly? > > Jan Better include in the next round to make Anthony's life easier (they're not critical anyway). BTW, Anthony, patches are being sent twice to the list, once by author and again by pull request. It is that way by your request.