qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC: 0/2] patch for QEMU HPET periodic timer emulation to alleviate time drift
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:54:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110207135400.GG14984@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4FF8DF.2070400@redhat.com>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 03:48 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
> >>  That's quite pointless, since those interrupts will be coalesced by
> >>  the guest.
> >>
> >Yes, of course, and this is what I remember happening. At this point
> >interrupt de-coalescing kicks in.
> 
> Maybe a more useful API would be to supply the callback with the
> number of missed wakeups since the last callback.  The callback
> could then change the wakeup frequency to compensate, or do other
> clever things.  If it needs the old behaviour, it can just execute
> its code in a loop.
> 
Mat be. Or may be we can ask for new behaviour during timer creation.
I was just surprised about the claim that we lost wakeups.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-07 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <480481933.225059.1296734409954.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <1375835067.226263.1296740625327.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2011-02-03 15:28   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC: 0/2] patch for QEMU HPET periodic timer emulation to alleviate time drift Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 20:07     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-03 21:24       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-04  2:06         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04  8:56           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 12:34             ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:11               ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 13:14                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:23                   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 13:34                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:41                     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-07 13:46                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:48                         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-07 13:51                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:54                             ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-02-07 14:10                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 14:28                       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:43                         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 14:54                           ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:57                             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:01                               ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 15:08                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:13                                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:17                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:29                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 19:30                                       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-08  9:11                                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:20                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:30                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 19:28                                     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:58                             ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:01                               ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:08                                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:14                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:16                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:22                                   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 15:18                               ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04  9:52           ` Ulrich Obergfell
2011-02-07 10:44       ` Ulrich Obergfell
2011-02-07 13:24       ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110207135400.GG14984@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).