From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH master/0.14] virtio-serial: Make sure virtqueue is ready before discarding data
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:25:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208025513.GE32178@amit-x200.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D50A9B7.7040004@codemonkey.ws>
On (Mon) 07 Feb 2011 [20:25:59], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 08:14 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Sun) 06 Feb 2011 [11:50:46], Amit Shah wrote:
> >>On (Fri) 04 Feb 2011 [06:52:04], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>On 02/04/2011 02:54 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >>>>This can happen if a port gets unplugged before guest has chance to
> >>>>initialise vqs.
> >>>>
> >>>>Reported-by: Juan Quintela<quintela@redhat.com>
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Amit Shah<amit.shah@redhat.com>
> >>>Applied to master, Thanks.
> >>What's the strategy to commit to 0.14?
> >Nevermind; saw it in the last pull.
>
> Yes, but if we decide to make this a subsection, we may need to
> revert this before the 0.14.0 release because once 0.14.0 goes out,
> we can't go back and change it.
Right.
However, virtio doesn't have vmstate yet. Are we willing to put vmstate
in 0.14 to introduce subsections? I doubt that.
> If that's how you want to approach it, then please send the revert
> patches. The flow_control=0 patches you sent out before definitely
> aren't the right approach for migration compatibility.
I understand, I've not looked at that thread yet, but if we want to do
that for 0.14 w/o vmstate, that might be the only way.
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 8:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH master/0.14] virtio-serial: Make sure virtqueue is ready before discarding data Amit Shah
2011-02-04 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2011-02-04 12:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-02-06 6:20 ` Amit Shah
2011-02-08 2:14 ` Amit Shah
2011-02-08 2:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-08 2:55 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2011-02-08 7:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-08 7:55 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110208025513.GE32178@amit-x200.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).